![]() ![]() ![]() The aim is to give an overview of these techniques from a forensic point of view and in addition to some other tests will try to prove that are forensically equivalent to any other method. The first test will focus on showing the differences on the different types of acquisition by comparing the results of a forensic analysis of the same device using Cellebrite UFED Touch and Physical Analyzer. The second test will try to prove that all physical acquisitions are equivalent by comparing the acquired data from the same device with two different methods. Keywords: Android, Forensic, JTAG, ISP, eMMC, Acquisition, Physical, LogicalĬERCS: P170,Computer science, numerical analysis, systems, control Abbreviations and Definitions JTAG Finally, the last test will focus on the examination of the content of an encrypted device to show if it is possible to find evidences. ![]() Table of Contents Click to expand Table of ContentsĢ.1 Android File System and Partition Layoutģ.1 Data acquisition types comparison with Cellebrite UFED Touchģ.2 Physical acquisition techniques comparison: UFED Touch vs “dd” commandĤ Testing and Comparing Forensic Acquisition Techniques with Step-by-Step GuideĤ.1 Data acquisition types comparison with Cellebrite UFED TouchĤ.2 Cellebrite UFED Touch and dd Physical memory dump Comparison Small Scale Digital Device Forensics Journal Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence ![]() #APPLE SERIAL NUMBER FINALLY SOLVED FORENSIC ANDROID# #APPLE SERIAL NUMBER FINALLY SOLVED FORENSIC ANDROID#. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |