![]() ![]() We use Fellow for all of our non-engineering meetings (which use Atlassian products instead).įinally, I know OP asked about notes and not Todo's / Action Items, but Fellow's handling AI's across teams has been better than Todoist's own business plan. The platform is great for our sales teams to capture notes during a call with a customer (sales CRMs like Pipedrive have this, but they do not make polished writing surfaces). Fellow's own website is targeted at manager-managee relationships (1-on-1 performance reviews, goal setting, etc). We recently switched to Fellow.app and are MUCH happier. Hugo had all the right goals, but bad execution. ![]() My team piloted Hugo.team for collaborative note-taking and sharing. Hosted solutions in the cloud make for janky writing surfaces IMO App speed and fluidity is important to me, which is one reason I haven't been able to stop using Bear. Worst case, I'll keep using Bear, but if there are gains to be had with a PKG then I am open to migrating. I'm diving into Roam now and holding out hope for Athens. I still use Coda as a low-code rapid app thingy (spreadsheets on steroids). Tried Notion & Coda and abandoned them both for notes / knowledge capture. I've used Bear for years and I still love it. I have two needs: 1) a personal knowledge archive / second brain and 2) collaborative note-taking and sharing of meeting minutes with my colleagues An article in The Information recently did a review of note-taking apps( ), and my response there is similar to what I'll post here: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |